Disclaimer: The opinion expressed here is not investment advice – it is provided for informational purposes only. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of BitMaden. Every investment and all trading involves risk, so you should always perform your own research prior to making decisions. We do not recommend investing money you cannot afford to lose.

Meteora Co-Founder Hit with New Lawsuit Over Token Scams Linked to Trump, Milei

Benjamin Chow, a well-known crypto developer and co-founder of the Meteora decentralized exchange on Solana, has been fingered as the driving force behind a plan to cheat investors through 15 different token schemes. A revised version of a class-action lawsuit that was first filed in a New York federal court on April 21, 2025, says that Chow, Meteora, and Kelsier Ventures, a firm run by Hayden Davis and some of his family members, used the names of famous people like U.S. First Lady Melania Trump and Argentine President Javier Milei to give credibility to coordinated scams meant to milk money from unwitting crypto investors. Mechanics of the Alleged Scheme The initial complaint accused Chow, Meteora, and members of the Davis family of lying to crypto investors. It said they made money at the expense of the public by manipulating the price of a Solana-based token called M3M3, which had as much as 95% of its supply controlled by a group of insiders. The amended document now claims that fraud may have happened with as many as 15 cryptocurrencies, including the controversial MELANIA and LIBRA meme coins, which were promoted by Mrs. Trump and President Milei, respectively. This information is said to have come from private messages shared by a whistleblower, in which Davis allegedly admitted to carrying out “at least fifteen token launches at Chow’s direction.” Those suing say that Chow and the other defendants “borrowed credibility” from public figures and used them as “window dressing” to make their plans seem more legitimate. For this reason, they are not holding Melania or Milei responsible; instead, they are focusing on Meteora, its co-founder, and the Kelsier management. The new filing claims that the alleged plot was carried out in a highly organized way, with each participant having a clear role. Chow was supposedly in charge of the technical side because of his “unique knowledge of the code and the ability to manipulate liquidity, fee routing, and supply controls.” As such, the complainants say it was possible for him to control the supply and prices of the new tokens, creating situations where their values could be artificially pushed up and then collapsed without the knowledge of ordinary traders. For the marketing side, the lawsuit points to Kelsier Ventures, where Hayden, Charles, and Gideon Davis used paid influencers and social media campaigns to make it look like there was real public demand for meme coins like MELANIA and LIBRA. The group reportedly used the same formula for all 15 tokens: they created artificial scarcity, flooded the internet with paid promotions, and then, when prices went up, the insiders sold all their holdings at once, which made the asset’s value drop and left other investors with huge losses. A Pattern of Denial and Mounting Evidence According to the lawsuit, after the LIBRA token crashed in February 2025, Meteora pretended to blacklist Kelsier, a move the plaintiffs called “performative.” Chow and members of the Meteora leadership are said to have made sworn declarations describing themselves as “passive developers of autonomous software,” suggesting they had nothing to do with the price behaviors of the crypto assets in question. The programmer quit Meteora in February, still insisting on his innocence, but data from blockchain analysis companies like Bubblemaps tell a different story. Their report from February 17, 2025, followed wallet addresses that clearly showed financial ties between those who made MELANIA and LIBRA, while revealing that insiders made more than $100 million in profits. The post Meteora Co-Founder Hit with New Lawsuit Over Token Scams Linked to Trump, Milei appeared first on CryptoPotato . CoinOtag

---

Ethereum Price Analysis: These Are ETH’s Next Targets Despite Prolonged Consolidation

Ethereum continues to display choppy price action, remaining confined within a critical range as both buyers and sellers await a decisive breakout. Further consolidation is likely before a clear directional move takes shape. Technical Analysis By Shayan The Daily Chart On the daily timeframe, Ethereum’s consolidation phase has extended, with volatility and momentum both fading. Price action remains trapped within a crucial range defined by the 100-day moving average and the flag pattern’s upper boundary near $4.1K. This region represents a key supply zone that has repeatedly rejected upward attempts. On the downside, the flag’s lower boundary, aligning with the $3.5K demand zone, acts as the primary support where buyers have consistently defended. Until a breakout occurs, Ethereum is expected to continue consolidating within this structure, absorbing order flow and building liquidity. A confirmed bullish breakout above $4.1K could likely trigger an impulsive rally toward a new all-time high (ATH). The 4-Hour Chart The 4-hour timeframe reveals Ethereum fluctuating inside a symmetrical triangle, reflecting ongoing market indecision and equilibrium between buyers and sellers. The asset is currently trading just below the triangle’s upper boundary near $4K, with momentum still insufficient for a confirmed breakout. This compression pattern signals a liquidity buildup phase, where traders are positioning ahead of a potential volatility expansion. If bulls manage to push above the upper trendline, a rally toward $4.1K and potentially $4.6K could follow. Conversely, a breakdown below $3.7K would expose the $3.4K demand zone once again. Until confirmation, Ethereum is likely to continue oscillating within this narrowing range — a setup that typically precedes a sharp directional breakout. Sentiment Analysis By Shayan The 1-month liquidation heatmap for Ethereum reveals a dense liquidity pocket forming above the $4.8K swing high, situated directly beyond the current symmetrical consolidation structure. This area corresponds to a significant cluster of resting short liquidations, implying that if Ethereum reclaims the mid-range near $4.1K–$4.3K, a rapid move to absorb this overhead liquidity could follow. Below the current price, the $3.5K range displays relatively weaker liquidation density, indicating that much of the downside liquidity was already cleared during last week’s sell-off, though a smaller residual cluster remains. This configuration reinforces the idea that Ethereum is likely to continue oscillating within its present consolidation range until one of these liquidity pockets is decisively tested. Overall, the heatmap confirms that short-term volatility will remain concentrated within the $3.4K–$4.8K corridor, with the upper range carrying a slightly higher probability of being targeted first due to the larger liquidity concentration above current levels. The post Ethereum Price Analysis: These Are ETH’s Next Targets Despite Prolonged Consolidation appeared first on CryptoPotato . CoinOtag